Talking of cartoons, shortly after the huge and impressive Charlie
Hebdo rallies had taken place in Paris and across the Western world, a
telling cartoon appeared in the Jerusalem Post. A boy sits across the table from his
father.
“Why were cartoonists killed?” he
asks.
“Over freedom of speech,” says
his Dad.
“So, why were Jews killed too?”
“Over freedom of existence.”
And indeed, one has to ask what
connection could there be between the murderous attack on the cartoonists of Charlie
Hebdo and the customers in a kosher supermarket? The same question might have been asked
following the Mumbai massacre of 2008, in which a series of twelve coordinated
shooting and bombing attacks were carried out by Pakistani jihadists. Why was
the Nariman House Jewish community centre included among the hotel, hospital
and cinema targets?
The world is beginning to understand
that within the warped Islamist ideology, bitter resentment at Western
intervention into the affairs of Muslim states, fury at less than respectful
references to the Prophet, and hatred of Jews, Judaism and Israel are all
intermingled. In their philosophy, terrorist
action directed against any is equally justifiable . So to Amedy Coulibaly, acting to support the
terrorists who attacked and killed the cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo, a
kosher supermarket seemed an entirely appropriate target to select. Just as, in the mindset of Pakistani
terrorists engaged in what was essentially an Islamist war against India, murdering
Jews was a basic component in the strategy.
From phone
conversations between those in Pakistan directing the Mumbai operation and the
terrorists –
recorded by Indian authorities on November 27, 2008, and later published in The
Hindu newspaper – it
is clear that the lives of those taken hostage in the attack on the Jewish
community centre were of no consequence.
Pakistan caller: If you are still threatened, then
don’t saddle yourself with the burden of the hostages. Immediately kill
them."
Mumbai terrorist at Nariman House: Yes, we shall do accordingly, God
willing.
Pakistan caller: Another thing: Israel has made a
request through diplomatic channels to save the hostages. If the hostages are
killed, it will spoil relations between India and Israel."
Mumbai terrorist: "So be it, God willing."
In
the event six Jewish lives were added to the 158 victims mowed down during those
four days of terror in November 2008.
Coulibaly,
too, having murdered four of his hostages, spoke on the phone and gave a TV
interview during the course of his siege of the kosher supermarket. Claiming he was sent by al-Qaeda in Yemen as
a defender of the Prophet, and that his attack had been synchronized with that by
the Kouachi brothers on the Charlie Hebdo offices, he offered no
justification for attacking a Jewish supermarket. Clearly he assumed that none
was called for.
On
January 11, 2015, a
letter appeared in the London Daily Telegraph.
“Sir – In all the comment about last week’s atrocities in Paris,
there has been much said about the rights and wrongs of insulting Muslim beliefs…
Extraordinarily, I have not heard or seen a single comment that
questions the motive of a killer who enters a Jewish supermarket and kills
random shoppers. It seems there is no need to explain. They were killed not
because they said or did things that were blasphemous or provocative, but
because they were probably Jews. Is the world so inured to this
that the question “Why?” is not even deemed necessary?
But the reason is
not difficult to discern. Islamists seek
to destroy Western freedoms throughout the world and substitute their own
version of a Muslim caliphate, and integral to their worldview is not only a total
intolerance for Jews, but a positive injunction to kill them whenever possible.
This hatred for Jews and
Israel has been brought to Europe as part of the baggage of radical Islamist
preachers. So far Western governments and organisations have failed to
recognize – or at least to acknowledge – two basic truths about all jihadists, whatever their hue: first,
that they are in earnest in their desire to pull down the institutions of
democracy and obliterate the Western way of life; and secondly that a hatred of
Jews, Judaism and Israel is locked into their ideology.
Joining the dots, it becomes abundantly
clear that for decades Israel – an island of Western democracy in a turbulent
Muslim ocean – has been in the vanguard of the anti-jihadist fight. The extremist Islamist entities of Hamas to
the east, Hezbollah to the north, and Iran to the west – all vehemently
anti-Semitic and dedicated to Israel’s destruction – have
been joined by jihadist factions in Syria and Iraq, led by Islamic State (or
“Daesh”, as Australia’s prime minister, Tony Abbott, proposes dubbing it, a term
it is said to loathe).
Now, in the light of the assault on the
French cartoonists and innocent supermarket shoppers, the Western world seems
to have committed itself to a determined effort to combat Islamist terror. Many
seem to have understood that this must also mean addressing the way Jew-hatred
has become acceptable in European society.
To repeat the mantra “Jews are the canary in civilization’s coalmine,” is
almost jejune, yet the aphorism remains as valid as the day it was coined. If Jews cannot live freely without fear of
attack in a democratic society, then everyone is at risk. The rising tide of anti-Semitism throughout Europe is a danger signal for Western democracy as a whole.
Perhaps some are beginning to appreciate the
connection between anti-Semitism and the distorted form of Islam promulgated by
jihadists of all hues. A hopeful
development is the news that on January 22 the United Nations General Assembly
is to hold its first-ever special meeting on “the global outbreak of
anti-Semitism.” The session was arranged following a petition
to the President of the General Assembly, Sam Kutesa, signed by 36 countries
and mounted on the initiative of the Israeli mission to the UN. Appropriately enough, the signatories include
all 28 members of the European Union – indicating that all acknowledge the recent worrying rise in anti-Semitic
activity within the countries of Europe.
Jihadist terrorism is by no means
exclusively anti-Semitic, but all anti-Semitic activity panders to the brutal,
inhumane and unacceptable world-view philosophy peddled by jihadists. The time has come for all people of goodwill,
whatever their religion or none, to take a determined stand against those who
believe that killing innocent people is an acceptable way to achieve their
objectives.
Published in the Jerusalem Post on-line, 19 January 2015:
http://www.jpost.com/Experts/Anti-Semitism-and-the-battle-against-Jihad-388228
Published in the Eurasia Review, 16 January 2015:
http://www.eurasiareview.com/16012015-anti-semitism-battle-jihad-oped/
Published in the Jerusalem Post on-line, 19 January 2015:
http://www.jpost.com/Experts/Anti-Semitism-and-the-battle-against-Jihad-388228
Published in the Eurasia Review, 16 January 2015:
http://www.eurasiareview.com/16012015-anti-semitism-battle-jihad-oped/
No comments:
Post a Comment