Published in the Jerusalem Post, 12 November 2024
However many charges of aggression, mass murder
and worse the Iranian regime chooses to level against Israel, there is no
disguising the fact that it is Iran that seeks to destroy
Israel, not the other way around.
On April 13, 2024 Iran – which essentially
means the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – committed a major strategic
blunder. Israel’s audacious attack on the Iranian diplomatic
compound in Damascus on April 1, 2024 had taken out seven Iranian military
advisers, including Mohammad Reza Zahedi, a senior commander in the élite Quds
Force of the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps). Such an operation
would normally have provoked Iranian ire and an armed response on northern
Israel from Hezbollah. Not on this occasion. Instead the incident
was used as the trigger for a fundamental shift in Iranian policy which has led
to negative consequences for Iran. They are still to be fully worked through
and may, in the final analysis, prove existential.
For 45 years – namely, since its foundation in 1979 – the Iranian regime had pursued its self-imposed mission of encompassing the destruction of Israel and its people through funding, arming and supporting organizations, groups and militias prepared to attack the Jewish state. At some point in the period leading up to April 13 Khamenei decided that the time had arrived to change tack. It must have been intense analysis and calculation by his advisers that led him to break the
principle that had guided Iran’s foreign strategy for so long, and finally
launch Iran’s very first direct onslaught on Israel.
How must the
figuring have gone? “Israel has never been weaker. It is bogged
down in its war in Gaza. It hasn’t succeeded in eliminating Hamas or
recovering its remaining hostages. It is being condemned on all sides for
vast numbers of civilian deaths. Hezbollah is attacking it daily on its
northern border. Houthi missiles are getting through its defenses. It is
the subject of an investigation by the International Court of Justice on a
charge of genocide. Imagine the effect of a direct Iranian attack.
Think of bombs falling on Israeli cities. Think of Israelis in their
hundreds slaughtered and injured. Israel will be humbled. The
Abraham Accords will disintegrate, and any hope of their extension will be
snuffed out.”
Khamenei’s military
advisers must have convinced him that a massive fleet of kamikaze UAVs
(unmanned aerial vehicles) would overwhelm Israel’s defenses, and at least some
50% of the missiles would get through. The aerial assault involved
hundreds of drones, cruise and ballistic missiles.
In the event Khamenei’s
anticipated military and propaganda triumph turned into a
humiliation. What Iran’s military strategists perhaps failed to take into
account was the united support of Israel’s allies, and Iran's own
unpopularity in the Arab world (Iranians may be Muslim, but they are not
Arabs). They surely did not count on Jordan and Saudi Arabia helping to
block Iran's UAVs from reaching Israel, nor that the UK and France would join
the US in backing Israel's Iron Dome in shooting down the Iranian
missiles.
Their subsequent failure
was to underestimate both the chutzpah and effectiveness of
Israel’s security and armed forces. Following the aerial assault of April
13, the Iranians were taken by surprise time and again. Within a week Israel
had responded with airstrikes on Iranian military sites in Syria and Iran
itself, while against a background of continuing tit-for-tat skirmishes, Israel
pursued its hunt for the Hamas leaders responsible for the barbaric attack of
October 7, and the Hezbollah leaders who supported them.
The targeted elimination
of Mohammed Deif, head of Hamas’s military wing, on July 13 was followed by the
even more telling retribution visited on Ismail Haniyeh, head of Hamas’s
political wing. In an especial humiliation for the regime, he was killed
in the heart of Iran’s capital, Tehran, by an explosion in his guesthouse, on
July 31.
Then came September
17-18, when hand-held communication devices, such as pagers and walkie-talkies,
manufactured specifically for Hezbollah and distributed widely to its
operatives, were detonated remotely. At least 42 fatalities and over
3,000 injuries, the vast majority of them Hezbollah operatives, was the
result. Though Israel made no claim, the world assumed it was
responsible.
Albert Einstein is
reputed to have said: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
expecting a different result.” Whatever Khamenei's thinking – perhaps he
believed his first aerial assault on Israel had been under-powered – he opted
for a second, bigger and more focused attempt. He decided to use some 200
advanced Fattah-1 and Kheibar Shekan missiles, and to target military and
intelligence locations.
In the event this second
Iranian attack, launched on October 1, was only marginally more damaging than
the first. Once again most missiles were intercepted by Israeli and US defense
systems, including support from US naval vessels stationed nearby.
How and when Israel
would retaliate became the subject of intense media speculation. The theorizing
was temporarily suspended when Iran’s prize collaborator, the head of Hamas,
Yahya Sinwar, was shot dead by the IDF on October 16.
While welcoming the news
as “a good day for Israel, for the United States, and for the world,” US
President Joe Biden made it clear that he did not want Israel to target Iran’s
nuclear and oil installations for fear of triggering all-out war.
When it came, Israel’s
response, delivered on October 25, respected his wish and consisted of heavy
air strikes on Iranian military targets in Syria and on Hezbollah’s military
infrastructure.
So Israel and Iran are
undoubtedly in conflict, if not formally at war. Anyone who cares to look
into the matter can see why no truce can be meaningful.
The objective of the
Iranian regime, from its foundation in 1979, has been to acquire as much power
and influence as possible in order to achieve the key objectives laid down by
the regime’s original Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. He affirmed
repeatedly that the very purpose of his revolution was to destroy Western-style
democracy and its way of life, and to impose Shia Islam on the whole
world. He identified the United States and Israel as his prime targets,
but included what was then the USSR.
“We wish to cause the
corrupt roots of Zionism, Capitalism and Communism to wither throughout the
world,” said Khomeini. “We wish, as does God almighty, to destroy the
systems which are based on these three foundations, and to promote the Islamic
order of the Prophet.” By this he meant his strict Shia interpretation of
Islam, for elsewhere he had declared that the holy cities of Mecca and Medina,
situated in the heart of Sunni Saudi Arabia, were in the hands of “a band of
heretics”.
These objectives have
driven the regime ever since, and continue to be its raison d’être.
“We shall export our
revolution to the whole world,” declared Khomeini. “Until the cry 'There is no
god but Allah' resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle.”
In short, Iran’s leaders
want to destroy the world as we know it. They want to achieve political
dominance in the Middle East, overthrow Western-style democracy of which
America is the prime exponent, wipe out the state of Israel, and impose Shia Islam
across the globe.
Whether the West wishes to acknowledge it or
not, in combatting Iran, Israel is fighting for the free world as a whole.
Published in the Jerusalem Post, and in the Jerusalem Post online titled: "How Iran's attacks on Israel backfired, escalating regional conflict", 12 Nov 2024:
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-828654