Monday, 25 May 2026

The bid to recapture Lebanon’s sovereignty

 Published in the Jerusalem Post, 26 May 2026

Ever since he was elected Lebanon’s president in January 2025, Joseph Aoun has emphasized that his primary aim is to end the humiliation of Hezbollah acting with impunity as “a state within a state”.  The nation, he decided, will no longer allow its sovereignty to be leased out to Iran or its proxy.  He will reclaim it.

​National sovereignty was being flouted on a daily basis by Iran’s ambassador-designate to Lebanon, Mohammad Reza Sheibani​.   Not yet formally accredited, ​he had distinguished his brief period in office by ​continually interfering in the​ nation's internal politics.  Moreover, he used his diplomatic cover to support Hezbollah’s military operations.  On March 24 the government declared him persona non grata and gave him until March 29 to leave the country.

"The ambassador will not leave Lebanon,” an Iranian diplomatic source told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on the 28th. This decision, he informed them, was in accordance with the wishes of Hezbollah and the speaker of parliament, Nabih Berri.  Berri, a Shi’ite Muslim, is a known supporter of Hezbollah. 

So Sheibani remained in his residence in Beirut, and on March 30 Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, told a press briefing in Tehran: “Our embassy in Lebanon remains operational.”

No greater affront to a nation’s sovereignty could be envisaged. Iran was telling the world that the Lebanese government was not the master in its own house.  Aoun took action.  He wrote to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the Security Council President. 

The complaint, which was filed officially on April 21, accused Sheibani of taking action, including issuing statements to the media, that amounted to direct interference in the nation’s internal affairs. It went on to charge Iran with multiple violations including "interfering in Lebanon's sovereign decision-making and entangling the state in a war it never chose". Moreover Lebanon accused Iran of "deploying Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps personnel in Lebanon under the guise of diplomatic activity.”

The letter challenges Iran’s accounts to the UN about Israeli strikes in Beirut, arguing that Tehran’s narrative is “full of falsehoods”.  And it accuses Iran of violating the Vienna Convention and international diplomatic norms by refusing to comply with Lebanon’s sovereign decision to expel Sheibani.  The 1961 Vienna Convention sets out the rules governing diplomacy between states.

Lebanon invited the UN to recognize and condemn these actions as breaches of international law, and to confirm that its order to expel Sheibani is legally valid and must be respected.  A response is awaited.  Unfortunately, effective action from the Security Council on this issue, as on so many, is less than assured. 

This effort to assert Lebanon’s national sovereignty is only the most recent of Aoun’s attempts.  Parliament elected him on January 8, 2025, after more than two years of a presidential vacancy.  With the restoration of national sovereignty his priority, in August 2025 Aoun and his cabinet instructed the army to develop a comprehensive plan to bring all weapons in the country under the control of state security forces, thereby ending Hezbollah’s autonomy.

 One month later Lebanon’s army chief, Rodolphe Haykal, presented the cabinet with a multi‑phase, region‑by‑region plan for disarming Hezbollah and other non‑state armed groups, with the ultimate goal of ensuring that all military hardware in Lebanon would be held exclusively by the state.  It began with a first phase aimed at removing Hezbollah’s weapons south of the Litani river by the end of 2025.

The cabinet authorized the army to begin enacting it at once. But it soon became clear that government forces lacked the capacity to implement the scheme. The army made some progress in dislodging Hezbollah from areas of southern Lebanon, but the plan was basically unviable. The state could not regain national sovereignty without help.

So from March 2026 Aoun began pushing the idea of face‑to‑face ceasefire talks with Israel, as part of a broader strategy that would ultimately bring Hezbollah’s weapons, and therefore Hezbollah itself, under state control.

The first 2026 Israel-Lebanon ceasefire deal was agreed on April 16, announced by US President Donald Trump following discussions with prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Aoun. Initially set to last ten days, the ceasefire was subsequently extended by three weeks on April 23, and then, on May 15, by an additional 45 days. 

There had been no official contact between Israel and Lebanon for four decades, so these negotiations were to be welcomed.  But what is the point of a ceasefire between two countries not in conflict with each other?  It is not the Lebanese armed forces but the uncontrollable Hezbollah that, at Iran’s behest, is attacking northern Israel, while Israel is trying to degrade its capacity to do so.

Aoun is in a difficult position.  On May 18 Lebanon’s al‑Jadeed TV channel published “a rare glimpse into Lebanese public opinion,” undertaken by the Beirut‑based statistics firm Information International.  It showed that Hezbollah still enjoys the support of much of the Muslim population – as against Christian, Maronite and Druze citizens, who are overwhelmingly opposed – and Aoun is fearful that too obvious an alliance with Israel could stir up civil conflict.  So for public consumption he steers clear of any suggestion of a Lebanon-Israel collaboration to disempower Hezbollah. He presents it as an effort to end further civilian casualties and structural damage.

In reality, however, preventing further devastation within Lebanon is dependent not on a pointless ceasefire agreement, but on Hezbollah’s actions, and Aoun has been unable to dissuade Hezbollah from continuing its armed attacks.  The ceasefire has therefore had no effect on Israel’s response.  On May 17 the media reported IDF strikes at nearly 100 Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon.

Israel also acts, when the opportunity arises, to eliminate known senior Hezbollah officials.  For example on May 6, in an airstrike on the southern suburbs of Beirut, a commander of Hezbollah’s elite Radwan force, Ahmed Ali Balout, was targeted and killed.

          It may be inexpedient for Aoun to admit it, but the truth is that the more Israel weakens Hezbollah, the more the president moves towards his objective of re-establishing Lebanon’s sovereignty over the terrorist organization.


Published in the Jerusalem Post titled "Recapture Lebanon's sovereignty", and the Jerusalem Post on-line, 26 May 2026:
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-897227

 

No comments:

Post a Comment