Published in the Jerusalem Post, 2 December 2024
On his first time around the presidential election circuit, Donald J Trump placed such emphasis on his desire to broker a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians, that once he was elected I decided to follow his progress on this matter with especial care. The result was my book “Trump and the Holy Land: 2016-2020” (see right), which I brought to a conclusion with a summary of the Israel-Palestinian peace plan that had been assiduously put together over the preceding four years by Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
With prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu by his side, Trump presented the plan to the world on January 28, 2020. It was greeted with howls of derision from Palestinians and their supporters around the Middle East and beyond, all vowing to thwart it if any attempt was made to put it into effect.
Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, appeared on television a few minutes after the Trump presentation, rejecting it root and branch:
.jpg)
Abbas’s reaction was far
from the view of some influential figures in the Middle East and across the
world. Bahrain and Oman signaled their approval by actually sending
representatives to the White House ceremony.
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, and the UAE all issued statements welcoming
the plan.
For example, the statement
issued by the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs ran: "The kingdom
appreciates the efforts of President Trump's administration to develop a
comprehensive peace plan between the Palestinian and the Israeli sides, and
encourages the start of direct peace negotiations between the Palestinian and
Israeli sides, under the auspices of the United States."
The Egyptian Ministry of
Foreign Affairs issued a similar statement: "Egypt recognizes the
importance of considering the US administration's initiative from the
perspective of the importance of achieving the resolution of the Palestinian
issue, thus restoring to the Palestinian people their full legitimate rights
through the establishment of a sovereign independent state in the Palestinian
occupied territories in accordance with international legitimacy and
resolutions."
The UK offered typically
restrained approval. Trump said that
then-UK prime minister, Boris Johnson, had called him earlier to offer support. Dominic Raab, Britain’s then-foreign
secretary, welcomed the plan as “a serious proposal” and urged the Palestinians
not to reject it out of hand. The
Australian government also welcomed the peace proposal, calling it a positive
move and encouraging both parties to consider it as a basis for dialogue.
So the plan certainly
had a degree of regional and international approval in 2020. Much water has flowed under the bridge since then. In 2024’s changed circumstances. with the
Hamas organization decapitated and Gaza on the verge of reconstitution, Trump’s
"Peace to Prosperity: A Vision to Improve the Lives of the Palestinian and
Israeli People" would certainly need amendment, but could it provide the
basis for a renewed peace process?
The plan is divided into two parts: economic and political. The economic portion was the first to be released, in June 2019. Subtitled “A New Vision for the Palestinian People,” the 40-page document set out in considerable detail a scenario under which, with a huge input of funding, prospects for the Palestinians would be immeasurably transformed for the better. In present circumstances what would additionally be required is a fully-funded program – to which, no doubt, Israel would contribute in full measure – designed to reconstruct Gaza’s cities in as short a timeframe as feasible.
As for the original
program, in the document’s words: “with the potential to facilitate more than
$50 billion in new investment over 10 years, Peace to Prosperity represents the
most ambitious and comprehensive effort for the Palestinian people to date. It has the ability to fundamentally transform
the West Bank and Gaza, and to open a new chapter in Palestinian history – one defined not by adversity and
loss, but by freedom and dignity.”
A
main goal was to connect
Palestinian-occupied areas to regional and global markets, included integrating
Gaza and the West Bank “through an efficient, modern transportation network,
including a transportation corridor directly connecting” the two areas. “Billions of dollars of new investment will flow
into various sectors of the Palestinian economy,” said the document, which also
detailed how “hospitals, schools, homes and businesses will secure access to
affordable electricity, clean water and digital services.”
Additionally the plan
envisaged improving the well-being of the Palestinian people through
educational programs, vocational and technical training, expanding the female
labor force, reducing Infant mortality
and increasing average life expectancy.
The
details were no sooner released than they were rejected out of hand by
Palestinian spokespeople. Abbas declared:
“there can be no economic solution before there’s a political solution.” Demonstrations opposing the plan were held in
the West Bank and Gaza.
The political component
of the plan, unveiled in 2020, while asserting that “any workable peace
agreement must address the Palestinians’ legitimate desire for
self-determination,” sweeps aside the issue of the “occupied territories” – namely the areas conquered from
the Jordanian, Egyptian and Syrian armies in the Six-Day War of 1967. Maintaining that the succession of UN
Resolutions claiming these areas as Palestinian are self-contradictory and
demonstrably ineffective, the plan proposes its own path to a peaceful
compromise. Israel would be allowed to incorporate West Bank settlements into
Israel proper, and in compensation would yield an equivalent amount of
territory adjacent to, and south of, the Gaza Strip.
So the plan envisages
the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank on the
areas outside the settlements, plus a greatly expanded Gaza. All the Palestinian territories would be made
contiguous by way of a network of highways, bridges and a road tunnel linking
the West Bank to Gaza. Additionally the
Palestinians would have a capital in eastern Jerusalem based on northern and
eastern neighborhoods that are outside the Israeli security barrier.
This prospect is made dependent on the Palestinian leadership renouncing terrorism and recognizing Israel as the Jewish state. The plan allows four years for these conditions to be met.
.jpg)
Back in 2016 Trump said: “I would love to be the one who made peace with Israel and the Palestinians. That would be such a great achievement.” If he remains as wedded to the idea in his second term, he would surely base his renewed effort on the painstaking work already undertaken by Jared Kushner. With the bones of a plan already devised, and the political landscape much changed, he might find the Palestinian leadership more amenable to negotiation than in 2020. Trump may yet act as honest broker in bringing a “Deal of the Century” to fruition.
Published in the Jerusalem Post, and the Jerusalem Post online titled: "Can Trump's 'deal of the century' be revived and bring Middle East peace?", 2 December 2024:
No comments:
Post a Comment