This article appears in the Jerusalem Post, 24 April 2022
MBS
went on to describe Israel as “a potential ally, with many interests we can
pursue together. But,” he added, “we have to solve some issues before we get to
that.”
What
are the issues that inhibit Saudi Arabia from joining its main Gulf allies —the
United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain — in normalizing relations with Israel,
as those Gulf states did in September 2020 in the Abraham Accords?
One main consideration is that Saudi Arabia, guardian of Islam's
two holiest sites, Mecca and Medina, is viewed by vast numbers of Muslims the
world over as the custodian of Islamic values.
Inevitably this makes the idea of normalization with Israel a more
sensitive issue for Saudi than for other Gulf states. However there would be nothing shocking
or unprecedented in Saudi Arabia taking this step. The precedent has been
set with the Abraham Accords.
Another restraining factor is that Saudi’s King Salman is acutely aware that the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative was conceived and proposed by his half-brother (and predecessor on the throne), then-Crown Prince Abdullah.
The Plan, endorsed on three occasions by the
Arab League, advocates a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine dispute, requiring
the establishment of a sovereign Palestine on territories overrun by Israel
during the Six-Day War, namely the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East
Jerusalem. Given that, and a just
resolution of the Palestinian refugee issue, the Plan promises full
normalization of relations between the Muslim world and Israel.
In
his address to the UN General Assembly in September 2021, Salman – ignoring the
fact that the Abraham Accords have breached the one-time Muslim consensus on
the Initiative – again committed Saudi Arabia to it, asserting that it offers a
"comprehensive and just solution" to the Palestine-Israel conflict
More recently MBS, the de
facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, and other Saudi spokespeople, have not referred
to the Initiative, but all have said repeatedly that normalization would not be
possible until the Israel-Palestine dispute is resolved.
"The priority now,”
Saudi foreign minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud told Hebrew-language
newspaper Maariv recently, “is to find an arrangement so that
Israelis and Palestinians can sit together and have a peace process…This will
make it easier for all countries that do not yet have relations with Israel. For us, this will happen when a just solution
is found."
He went on to
acknowledge: "The integration of Israel in the region will be a huge
benefit not only for Israel itself but for the entire region."
Yet MBS must be aware that the Palestinian Authority’s advocacy of
the two-state solution is not its real objective. The true aim of the Palestinian leadership,
like that of Hamas and a substantial proportion of Palestinian opinion, is to remove
Israel and acquire the whole of mandate Palestine “from the river to the sea”. It
is an objective repeated again and again to
the domestic
audience.
However the two-state
tactic is itself a flimsy device. Supporting the concept fulfils a useful
public relations function, but no Palestinian leader would be foolhardy enough
to sign up to two states, which is why every attempt at a peace deal over the
years – and there have been many – has foundered. Acknowledging Israel’s legal rights in the
region would bring a charge of treachery to the Palestinian cause down on his
head. Hamas would exclude Gaza from any
such deal, and internal political upheaval might well follow. Yet along with
the UN, the EU and much of the Western world, the official Saudi line is to persist
in believing that an Israel-Palestinian deal which recognizes Israel’s
legitimate status in the region is a practical possibility.
All four Muslim states
that have so far signed up to the Abraham Accords maintain their support for
Palestinian aspirations, but they have decided that solving the intractable
Israel-Palestinian dispute should no longer be a pre-requisite for normalizing
relations with Israel. They will support
efforts to reach an accord, but they prioritize developing a flourishing Middle
East for the benefit of all its citizens.
Each of the four had
particular reasons for joining the Accords. The UAE is intent on countering the
regional dominance sought by Iran and Turkey, but it is also developing
commercial and hi-tech scientific links with Israel, increasing defense
cooperation, and obtaining from Washington weapon systems like the F-35
fifth-generation fighter jet. Bahrain, too - its leaders Sunni, its population
majority Shia - appreciates Israel’s strength in opposing not only Iran, but
also the violent extremist groups supported by Iran in Syria, Iraq, and
Lebanon. On joining the Accords Sudan was
removed from the US list of state sponsors of terrorism, while Morocco gained
US recognition of its claims over Western Sahara.
When Saudi Arabia weighs
the pros and cons of normalizing its relationship with Israel, or formally joining
the Abraham Accords, Israel’s determination to counter Iran’s ambitions to
dominate the Middle East would be a major consideration. MBS would also hope the move would help repair
Saudi’s strained relations with Washington.
The murder of Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate
in Istanbul in October 2018. continues to reverberate in US political circles. Normalizing relations with Israel could change
perceptions about Saudi Arabia in both main parties, and help restore MBS’s status
among the US elite.
So MBS has been careful
to keep the normalization option open. Far from condemning its neighboring Gulf
states, Saudi Arabia has signaled tacit support for the UAE and Bahrain. It
has allowed unprecedented access to Saudi airspace for Israeli commercial
planes, and reports of high-level meetings between Saudi and Israeli representatives
continue to appear in the media. It was no doubt a source of regret that it
could not participate along with the UAE and Bahrain in the so-called Negev
Summit on 28 March.
The omens for Saudi Arabia and Israel soon formalizing what is already something close to a partnership seem good.
Published in Jerusalem Post, 24 April 2022:
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-704889
No comments:
Post a Comment