Updated version of article published in the Jerusalem Report, issue dated 12 January, 2026
It was back in January
2014 that then UK prime minister, David Cameron, feeling that the UK had
not done enough to memorialise the unique horrors of the Holocaust, set up a
Holocaust Commission.
“The Holocaust is unique
in man’s inhumanity to man,” ran its remit. “…As the events of the Holocaust
become ever more distant, they will feel increasingly remote to current and
future generations. The Holocaust Commission will investigate what further
measures should be taken to ensure Britain has a permanent and fitting memorial
to the Holocaust...”
It was not as though
Britain had failed to commemorate the Shoah. A Holocaust Memorial was
established in 1983 in Hyde Park, in the very centre of London. Conceived as a
garden of boulders surrounded by white-stemmed birch trees, the largest boulder
is inscribed with this text from the Book of Lamentations: "For these I weep. Streams of tears
flow from my eyes because of the destruction of my people."
Remembrance
services are held there every year, the most recent on July 7, 2025, when
Prince William joined survivors and bereaved families, together with key
figures from the Jewish community and British public life, to honor the victims
of the Holocaust.
There
is also a permanent Holocaust exhibition in the Imperial War Museum in South
London, designed to connect the Holocaust to the broader events of the Second
World War. Following a multi-million redevelopment in 2021, the exhibition now
extends over two gallery floors, presenting a detailed account of the Holocaust
and its impact.
In January 2015 Cameron’s Holocaust Commission issued its report
and recommendations which were instantly accepted in full by the government,
and endorsed by the Opposition.
It recommended there
should be a “striking and prominent” new memorial, located in central London,
to serve as the focal point of the nation’s commemoration of the Holocaust. In
addition a world-class Learning Centre, to be located together with the
Memorial, should become the hub for Holocaust education in every part of the
country.
To help carry the
project forward, the government set up a UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation
composed of eminent establishment figures including the Chief Rabbi, Ephraim
Mirvis. The Foundation quickly embarked on a dual search – for a suitable
location and a winning design.
The decisions it reached
on both instantly plunged the whole project into a whirlpool of objections.
Dispute and dissension have pursued it ever since.
The site selected for the new memorial, and included in the terms of the international design competition that the Foundation also announced, was a small park adjacent to the Victoria Tower, which stands at the far end of the Palace of Westminster, the seat of the UK parliament. At less than five acres, Victoria Tower Gardens is about the size of three football pitches.
The announcement was no sooner published than it was followed by a flood of objections. Victoria Tower Gardens, it was argued, is too small to absorb a large memorial. Much of its green open space and amenity for everyday public recreation would be destroyed. The scheme would harm the setting of the Palace of Westminster World Heritage Site, as well as existing listed monuments in the gardens. Security, crowding, traffic, and flooding risk were additional problems. Siting it within the Imperial War Museum would be more appropriate. Finally it was pointed out that an Act of 1900 protected the gardens as public open space.
It was on this issue
that objectors sought a legal ruling. In
2022 they took their case to the High Court, and won. The legal
determination was that the Holocaust Memorial would breach the 1900 Act, which
restricts the use of Victoria Tower Gardens to that of a public garden.
To overcome this legal
barrier, the then Conservative government introduced a new piece of legislation
– the Holocaust Memorial Bill – to disapply certain provisions of the 1900 Act,
so as to allow the project to proceed as planned. This parliamentary strategy
enabled the project to remain “up and running”.
Some objectors, however, signalled their intention to pursue further
legal action.
The international design competition attracted 92 entries. In October 2017 the Foundation announced that the British-Ghanaian architect Sir David Adjaye, leading a team that included Israeli designer Ron Arad, had submitted the winning design.
Their memorial building
features 23 bronze fins, with the gaps between the fins representing the 22
countries where the Holocaust destroyed Jewish communities. Each gap acts as a separate path down to a
hall leading into the Learning Center.
The design was
immediately subject to a torrent of criticism.
The row of tall bronzed fins and sunken courtyard was, it was asserted,
visually harsh and out of sympathy with both the subject matter and its
surroundings. Some contended that combining an underground learning centre with
a memorial would result in a cramped, didactic experience that risks
oversimplifying the Holocaust. Others that
the design would create a “theme‑park” style procession and potential security
target, subordinating contemplative remembrance to spectacle and crowd
management.
All these, and a multitude of other objections have been thoroughly and meticulously addressed during the passage of the Bill through the House of Lords. And now the Bill has become an Act of Parliament. This means the groundbreaking ceremony could take place before the end of 2026.
Official project literature suggests that the construction phase would take around three years. So, provided the determined objectors do not get their way, Britain’s new Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre, envisioned way back in 2014, could finally become a reality some time in 2029.
.jpg)


No comments:
Post a Comment